(NAME-MCE) FW: [SpeakingOutAgainstRacism] "Explaining White Privilege"
Carrie Stewart
cls2001 at swbell.net
Fri Sep 19 17:29:54 EDT 2008
This one's even better ~
I can sooo relate to that *sigh*
Carrie L. Stewart, M.C.I.S.
Owner/Principal
One World Consulting
OneWorld at swbell.net
512-350-9030 (O/M)
Gathering People ~ Finding Common Ground
Explaining <http://feedblitz.com/r.asp?l=36701677&f=92525&u=5419445> White
Privilege
By Tim
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://www.timwise.org/>
Wise
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://afronetizen.blogs.com/
photos/uncategorized/2008/09/18/timwise1.jpg>
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://afronetizen.blogs.com/
photos/uncategorized/2008/09/18/timwise1.jpg> Timwise1
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://afronetizen.blogs.com/
photos/uncategorized/2008/09/18/timwise1.jpg> Sigh.
I guess I should have expected it, seeing as how it's nothing new. I write a
piece on racism and white privilege (namely, the recently viral, "This
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://www.redroom.com/blog/t
im-wise/this-your-nation-white-privilege> is Your Nation on White
Privilege"), lots of folks read it, many of them like it, and others e-mail
me in fits of apoplexy, or post scathing critiques on message boards in
which they invite me to die, to perform various sexual acts upon myself that
I feel confident are impossible, or, best of all, to "go live in the
ghetto," whereupon I will come to "truly appreciate the animals" for whom I
have so much affection (the phrase they use for me and that affection, of
course, sounds a bit different, and I'll leave it to your imagination to
conjure the quip yourself).
Though I have no desire to debate the points made in the
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://www.redroom.com/blog/t
im-wise/this-your-nation-white-privilege> original piece, I would like to
address some of the more glaring, and yet reasonable, misunderstandings that
many seem to have about the subject of white privilege. That many white
folks don't take well to the term is an understatement, and quite
understandable. For those of us in the dominant group, the notion that we
may receive certain advantages generally not received by others is a
jarring, sometimes maddening concept. And if we don't understand what the
term means, and what those who use it mean as they deploy it, our
misunderstandings can generate anger and heat, where really, none is called
for. So let me take this opportunity to explain what I mean by white
privilege.
Of course, the original piece only mentioned examples of white privilege
that were directly implicated in the current presidential campaign. It made
no claims beyond that. Yet many who wrote to me took issue with the notion
that there was such a thing, arguing, for instance that there are lots of
poor white people who have no privilege, and many folks of color who are
wealthy, who do. But what this argument misses is that race and class
privilege are not the same thing.
Though we are used to thinking of privilege as a mere monetary issue, it is
more than that. Yes, there are rich black and brown folks, but even they are
subject to racial profiling and stereotyping (especially because those who
encounter them often don't know they're rich and so view them as decidedly
not), as well as bias in mortgage lending, and unequal treatment in schools.
So, for instance, even the children of well-off black families are more
likely to be suspended or expelled from school than the children of poor
whites, and this is true despite the fact that there is no statistically
significant difference in the rates of serious school rule infractions
between white kids or black kids that could justify the disparity (according
to fourteen different studies examined by Russ Skiba at Indiana University).
As for poor whites, though they certainly are suffering economically, this
doesn't mean they lack racial privilege. I grew up in a very modest
apartment, and economically was far from privileged. Yet I received better
treatment in school (placement in advanced track classes even when I wasn't
a good student), better treatment by law enforcement officers, and indeed
more job opportunities because of connections I was able to take advantage
of, that were pretty much unavailable to the folks of color I knew growing
up. Likewise, low income whites everywhere are able to clean up, go to a job
interview and be seen as just another white person, whereas a person of
color, even who isn't low-income, has to wonder whether or not they might
trip some negative stereotype about their group when they go for an
interview or sit in the classroom answering questions from the teacher. Oh,
and not to put too fine a point on it, but even low-income whites are more
likely to own their own home than middle income black families, thanks to
past advantages in housing and asset accumulation, which has allowed those
whites to receive a small piece of property from their families.
The point is, privilege is as much a psychological matter as a material one.
Whites have the luxury of not having to worry that our race is going to mark
us negatively when looking for work, going to school, shopping, looking for
a place to live, or driving for that matter: things that folks of color
can't take for granted.
Let me share an analogy to make the point.
Taking things out of the racial context for a minute: imagine persons who
are able bodied, as opposed to those with disabilities. If I were to say
that able-bodied persons have certain advantages, certain privileges if you
will, which disabled persons do not, who would argue the point? I imagine
that no one would. It's too obvious, right? To be disabled is to face
numerous obstacles. And although many persons with disabilities overcome
those obstacles, this fact doesn't take away from the fact that they exist.
Likewise, that persons with disabilities can and do overcome obstacles every
day, doesn't deny that those of us who are able-bodied have an edge. We have
one less thing to think and worry about as we enter a building, go to a
workplace, or just try and navigate the contours of daily life. The fact
that there are lots of able-bodied people who are poor, and some disabled
folks who are rich, doesn't alter the general rule: on balance, it pays to
be able-bodied.
That's all I'm saying about white privilege: on balance, it pays to be a
member of the dominant racial group. It doesn't mean that a white person
will get everything they want in life, or win every competition, but it does
mean that there are general advantages that we receive.
So, for instance, studies have found that job applicants with white sounding
names are 50% more likely to receive a call-back for a job interview than
applicants with black-sounding names, even when all job-related
qualifications and credentials are the same.
Other studies have found that white men with a criminal record are more
likely to get a call-back for an interview than black male job applicants
who don't have one, even when all requisite qualifications, demeanor and
communication styles are the same.
Others have found that white women are far more likely than black women to
be hired for work through temporary agencies, even when the black women have
more experience and are more qualified.
Evidence from housing markets has found that there are about two million
cases of race-based discrimination against people of color every year in the
United States. That's not just bad for folks of color; the flipside is that
there are, as a result, millions more places I can live as a white person.
Or consider criminal justice. Although data from the Substance
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://www.samhsa.gov/>
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration indicates that whites are
equally or more likely than blacks or Latinos to use drugs, it is people of
color (blacks and Latinos mostly) who comprise about 90 percent of the
persons incarcerated for a drug possession offense. Despite the fact that
white men are more likely to be caught with drugs in our car (on those
occasions when we are searched), black men remain about four times more
likely than white men to be searched in the first place, according to
Justice Department findings. That's privilege for the dominant group.
That's the point: privilege is the flipside of discrimination. If people of
color face discrimination, in housing, employment and elsewhere, then the
rest of us are receiving a de facto subsidy, a privilege, an advantage in
those realms of daily life. There can be no down without an up, in other
words.
None of this means that white folks don't face challenges. Of course we do,
and some of them (based on class, gender, sexual orientation, disability
status, or other factors) are systemic and institutionalized. But on
balance, we can take for granted that we will receive a leg-up on those
persons of color with whom we share a nation.
And no, affirmative
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Affirmative_action> action doesn't change any of this.
Despite white fears to the contrary, even with affirmative action in place
(which, contrary to popular belief does not allow quotas or formal
set-asides except in those rare cases where blatant discrimination has been
proven) whites hold about ninety percent of all the management level jobs in
this country, receive about ninety-four percent of government contract
dollars, and hold ninety percent of tenured faculty positions on college
campuses. And in spite of affirmative action programs, whites are more
likely than members of any other racial group to be admitted to their
college of first choice.* And according to a study released last year, for
every student of color who received even the slightest consideration from an
affirmative action program in college, there are two whites who failed to
meet normal qualification requirements at the same school, but who got in
anyway because of parental influence, alumni status or because other favors
were done.
Furthermore, although white students often think that so-called minority
scholarships are a substantial drain on financial aid resources that would
otherwise be available to them, nothing could be further from the truth.
According to a national study by the General
<http://www.feedblitz.com/t.asp?/92525/5419445/http://www.gao.gov/docsearch/
repandtest.html> Accounting Office, less than four percent of scholarship
money in the U.S. is represented by awards that consider race as a factor at
all, while only 0.25 percent (that's one quarter of one percent for the math
challenged) of all undergrad scholarship dollars come from awards that are
restricted to persons of color alone. What's more, the idea that large
numbers of students of color receive the benefits of race-based scholarships
is lunacy of the highest order. In truth, only 3.5 percent of college
students of color receive any scholarship even partly based on race,
suggesting that such programs remain a pathetically small piece of the
financial aid picture in this country, irrespective of what a gaggle of
reactionary white folks might believe.**
In other words, despite the notion that somehow we have attained an equal
opportunity, or color-blind society, the fact is, we are far from an
equitable nation. People of color continue to face obstacles based solely on
color, and whites continue to reap benefits from the same. None of this
makes whites bad people, and none of it means we should feel guilty or beat
ourselves up. But it does mean we need to figure out how we're going to be
accountable for our unearned advantages. One way is by fighting for a
society in which those privileges will no longer exist, and in which we will
be able to stand on our own two feet, without the artificial crutch of
racial advantage to prop us up. We need to commit to fighting for racial
equity and challenging injustice at every turn, not only because it harms
others, but because it diminishes us as well (even as it pays dividends),
and because it squanders the promise of fairness and equity to which we
claim to adhere as Americans.
It's about responsibility, not guilt. And if one can't see the difference
between those two things, there is little that this or any other article can
probably do. Perhaps starting with a dictionary would be better.
_____
* U.S Federal Glass Ceiling Commission, Good for Business: Making Full Use
of the Nation's Human Capital. (Washington DC: Bureau of National Affairs,
March 1995); Fred L. Pincus, Reverse Discrimination: Dismantling the Myth.
(Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003), 18; Roberta J. Hill, "Far More
Than Frybread," in Race in the College Classroom: Pedagogy and Politics, ed.
Bonnie TuSmith and Maureen T. Reddy. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University
Press), 169; Sylvia Hurtado and Christine Navia, "Reconciling College Access
and the Affirmative Action Debate," in Affirmative Action's Testament of
Hope, ed. Mildred Garcia (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1997), 115.
** U.S. General Accounting Office, 1994. "Information on Minority Targeted
Scholarships," B251634. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office,
January; Stephen L. Carter, "Color-Blind and Color-Active," 1992. The
Recorder. January 3.
__._,_.___
Messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/message/914;_ylc=X3o
DMTMyM2VjYWl1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BG1
zZ0lkAzkxNARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyMjE4NDUyMzIEdHBjSWQDOTE0> in
this topic (1)
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJvbj
I1dXBnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BG1zZ0lkAz
kxNARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzEyMjE4NDUyMzI-?act=reply&messageNum=914>
Reply (via web post) | Start
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNX
Awc2xvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwNmdH
IEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTIyMTg0NTIzMg--> a new topic
Messages
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/messages;_ylc=X3oDMT
JlYW4yMW9hBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYw
NmdHIEc2xrA21zZ3MEc3RpbWUDMTIyMTg0NTIzMg--> | Polls
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZ
3NlcnZmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwNmd
HIEc2xrA3BvbGxzBHN0aW1lAzEyMjE4NDUyMzI->
"Each time you allow hate to go unchallanged..YOU legitamize it'spresence"
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkbDRtZ2czBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5M
DgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMjIxODQ1MjMy>
Yahoo! Groups
Change
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZT
V0MW91BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwNmdH
IEc2xrA3N0bmdzBHN0aW1lAzEyMjE4NDUyMzI-> settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID
required)
Change settings via email: Switch
<mailto:SpeakingOutAgainstRacism-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Deli
very:%20Digest> delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
<mailto:SpeakingOutAgainstRacism-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%
20Delivery%20Format:%20Traditional> format to Traditional
Visit
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism;_ylc=X3oDMTJkb2NoaDg
2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwNmdHIEc2x
rA2hwZgRzdGltZQMxMjIxODQ1MjMy> Your Group | Yahoo! Groups
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
<mailto:SpeakingOutAgainstRacism-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=>
Visit
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SpeakingOutAgainstRacism;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcjlsOGd
2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzc5MDgyMjUEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDY0Mzg2BHNlYwN2dGwEc2x
rA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTIyMTg0NTIzMg--> Your Group
Curves on Yahoo!
A
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13p0fo1ss/M=493064.12016299.12445691.11322765/D
=groups/S=1705064386:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1221852432/L=/B=0ZWKI0LaX.Q-/J=122184523
2398570/A=4990221/R=0/SIG=11odsb6gn/*http:/new.groups.yahoo.com/Women_Of_Cur
ves_Everywhere> group for women
to share & discuss
food & weight loss.
Weight Loss Group
on
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13pjjh9m7/M=493064.12016300.12445692.11323196/D
=groups/S=1705064386:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1221852432/L=/B=0pWKI0LaX.Q-/J=122184523
2398570/A=5170419/R=0/SIG=11b5gu1oe/*http:/new.groups.yahoo.com/specialKgrou
p> Yahoo! Groups
Get support and
make friends online.
Real Food Group
Share
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o42q7j5/M=493064.12016243.13036160.8674578/D=
groups/S=1705064386:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1221852432/L=/B=05WKI0LaX.Q-/J=1221845232
398570/A=5379226/R=0/SIG=11gatb1qb/*http:/advision.webevents.yahoo.com/hellm
anns/> recipes,
restaurant ratings
and favorite meals.
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=7908225/grpspId=1705064386/msgId
=914/stime=1221845232/nc1=4990221/nc2=5170419/nc3=5379226>
__,_._,___
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 41195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/attachments/20080919/f9944e96/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Name-mce
mailing list