(NAME-MCE) Seattle's gifted program

Tue Dec 11 22:08:10 EST 2007

Hello Anselmo - 

Forgive me for mixing threads, but I saw your post on Seattle's gifted program in the archives and wanted to jump in.

I am going to be doing observations and student-teaching in a school that is over 60% Hispanic and I would love to be able to do some work with identifying gifted math students.

 Below is a link to a UCONN program that has some ideas regarding the reasons for minority underrepresentation in gifted programs.
I have located a couple of resources regarding underrepresentation, but have not found anything regarding 1) how to improve identification (without redefining giftedness) or 2) references to successful gifted programs that have proportional representation. 

Do you or anyone else out there have any positive examples?

Thanks

http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/frasgarc.html> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 07:45:07 -0800> From: anselmo.villanueva at gmail.com> To: name-mce at nameorg.org> Subject: (NAME-MCE) New poll: 1 in 3 would deny undocumented immigrants social services> > > > There is little public support for giving students who lack the legal> documents to legally stay in the United States in-state tuition rates,> a poll by the Los Angeles Times has found. The report, which covers a> variety of immigration policies, found that only 20 percent of> Democrats and 6 percent of Republicans support the use of in-state> rates for these students.> > Complete article below. For related stories and pictures, surf to:> > http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-immigpoll6dec06,1,2950659,full.story?ctrack=5&cset=true> > TIMES/BLOOMBERG POLL> 1 in 3 would deny illegal immigrants social services> In Iowa Falls, Iowa> > Matthew Putney / For The LA Times> > By Janet Hook, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer> December 6, 2007> > WASHINGTON -- One-third of Americans want to deny social services,> including public schooling and emergency room healthcare, to illegal> immigrants, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.> > Still, in a sign of ambivalence among voters about the emotionally> charged issue, a strong bipartisan majority -- 60% -- favors allowing> illegal immigrants who have not committed crimes to become citizens if> they pay fines, learn English and meet other requirements.> > Those crosscurrents create treacherous political waters for the major> presidential candidates, many of whom have tended to avoid> spotlighting the issue. But all have been forced to address the issue> under repeated questioning at campaign events and candidate forums.> > During Tuesday's radio debate among Democrats, the candidates were> asked if citizens should turn in someone they know to be an illegal> immigrant. Most said no. In other settings, however, several have been> talking a tough line on issues such as denying driver's licenses to> illegal immigrants.> > Some poll respondents, in follow-up interviews, expressed frustration> that the candidates had not been more forthright in addressing> immigration-related issues.> > "I don't know what the answer is, but I don't think the candidates> know what the answer is either," said Lodie Lambright, a retired state> government worker in Rhode Island.> > The survey, conducted under the supervision of Times Poll Director> Susan Pinkus, was based on interviews conducted Friday through Monday> with 1,245 registered voters. The margin of sampling error was plus or> minus 3 percentage points.> > The poll indicates that while most of those surveyed viewed illegal> immigration as a key concern, it was not the most important issue on> their minds.> > Asked to pick from a list of issues what was a top priority for> presidential candidates, 15% said illegal immigration -- the> fifth-most mentioned topic behind the Iraq war, the economy,> protecting the country from terrorist attacks and healthcare. Asked> how much of a problem illegal immigration is, 81% of respondents said> they considered it important, including 27% who said it was one of the> country's most pressing problems.> > The poll also makes clear that respondents make a distinction between> legal and illegal immigrants. Asked if illegal immigrants had made a> positive or negative contribution to their community, 36% said> negative, whereas 21% said positive and 29% said the effect was not> discernible.> > When the same question was asked about legal immigrants, 12% said> their contribution was negative, compared with 46% who said positive> and 31% who saw no discernible effect.> > "I don't mind immigration, but I do think they need to learn the> English language and should become an American citizen," said Patricia> Buckner, a Florida retiree.> > When those who said immigrants -- whether legal or illegal -- had made> a negative contribution, they were asked in what way. The reasons most> often cited were the loss of American jobs (35%), increased crime> (30%) and increased cost of social services (19%).> > The survey, which allowed respondents to name as many as five social> services they would allow, showed a disparity: Far more people would> allow access to emergency room care and schooling than other benefits,> such as food stamps and driver's licenses.> > About 46% of respondents said that immigrants should be able to get> emergency medical treatment, and 40% said they should have access to> public schools.> > But 22% of those surveyed said that illegal immigrants should be able> to get limited driver's licenses -- a question that has put the> Democratic presidential candidates on the spot recently.> > The finding underscores the political climate that caused many leading> Democrats to oppose licenses for illegal immigrants when it was> proposed in New York this year by Gov. Eliot Spitzer, a Democrat, who> eventually backed down.> > When Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) was asked about the proposal> in a debate in late October, she praised Spitzer but stopped short of> backing his plan. In a debate a few weeks later, she said she opposed> driver's licenses for illegal immigrants.> > Some of those resisting the idea of providing a range of services to> illegal immigrants say that it drains resources from U.S. citizens and> legal immigrants who are in need.> > "It seems like our money in this country is going out faster than it> is coming in, and [the spending is] helping the people who are not> U.S. citizens," said Buckner, who described herself as a liberal> Democrat.> > The poll also found stiff resistance to allowing illegal immigrants to> pay discounted in-state tuition at public colleges: 12% of those> surveyed -- including 20% of Democrats and 6% of Republicans --> supported that idea.> > That illuminates why GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee has> taken flak from his party for supporting, while he was governor of> Arkansas, a college subsidy for the children of illegal immigrants.> > However, some of those polled saw a humanitarian need to provide> emergency healthcare, education and other basic services to illegal> immigrants, especially to their children.> > "You don't want to see a child go hungry or go ill," said Beverly> Taylor, a retired postal worker in Indiana.> > Respondents were divided about the best solution to the problem, but a> strong majority expressed support for a proposal discussed in Congress> -- part of a package backed by President Bush -- that would create a> pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants already in the United> States.> > The plan, under which illegal immigrants could become citizens if they> have no criminal record, register with the Department of Homeland> Security, pay a fine, learn English and meet other requirements, was> supported by 64% of Democrats and 62% of Republicans.> > However, that plan died in Congress under withering fire from critics> who called for the nation to tighten border security before> considering more liberalized treatment of illegal immigrants.> > And the plan has been little discussed by candidates on the> presidential campaign trail -- even by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who> was one of its leading proponents.> > The poll suggests that neither party heads into the 2008 election with> a decisive advantage on the issue, with Democrats having lost an edge> they once enjoyed.> > Those surveyed were evenly split on which of the two major parties> would do a better job handling immigration: 31% chose Republicans and> 30% picked Democrats. By contrast, a poll in June 2006 showed 34%> preferred Democrats and 23% preferred Republicans.> > janet.hook at latimes.com> > _______________________________________________> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural Education -> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this listserv go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You can read all past postings in the archives at http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/> > > > Name-mce mailing list> Name-mce at nameorg.org> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org> 
_________________________________________________________________
i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect