(Name-mce) ListServ Name-mce Digest, Vol 375, Issue 1
Anderson Cheryl
Cheryl.Anderson at redclay.k12.de.us
Tue Nov 28 10:35:31 EST 2006
please do not send any more e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: name-mce-bounces at nameorg.org
[mailto:name-mce-bounces at nameorg.org]On Behalf Of
name-mce-request at nameorg.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:19 AM
To: name-mce at nameorg.org
Subject: Name-mce Digest, Vol 375, Issue 1
Send Name-mce mailing list submissions to
name-mce at nameorg.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
name-mce-request at nameorg.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
name-mce-owner at nameorg.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Name-mce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: 10 Most Important Books: Poll (Ana Mari Woehr)
2. Re: 10 Most Important Books: Poll (Talitha Abramsen)
3. Re: We are all NOT racist, unconsciously (Paul or Lisa)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:42:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Ana Mari Woehr <roigassociates at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ 10 Most Important Books: Poll
To: NAME-MCE - National Association for Multicultural Education Email
Discussion Group <name-mce at nameorg.org>
Message-ID: <780366.26850.qm at web55911.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Here are my 10 faves (most of these came from assigned readings for my graduate program a couple of years ago...) :
1> Race, Class and Gender - An Anthology. Margaret L. Andersen and Patricia Hills Collins
2> We Make This Road by Walking. Horton and Freire
3> Thinking Class - Sketches from a Cultural Worker. Joanna Kadi
4> Talking Back - THinking Feminist/Thinking Black. bell hooks
5> Revolutionary Multiculturalism - Pedagogies of Dissent for the New Millenium. Peter McLaren
6> Latina es Poder (Latina is Power!) . Ana Nogales, Ph.D.
7> Roots of Justice - Stories of Organizing in Communities of Color - Larry R. Solomon
8> The Dreamkeepers - Succesful Teachers of African American Children. Gloria Ladson-Billings.
9>Margins and Mainstreams - Asians in American History and Culture. Gary K. Okihiro
10>Homophobia - A weapon of Sexism. Suzanne Pharr.
"Paul C.Gorski" <gorski at edchange.org> wrote: Hello, friends.
I'm doing a bit of a poll. It's very simple. Please send me what you believe
to be the 10 (or up to 10) most important books related to equity, social
justice, and/or multicultural education. Please send the book title and
author name.
Feel free to think outside the box. The books don't have to be about
education explicitly and they don't even have to be non-fiction. But I'm
hoping for books that push boundaries, that aren't, in essence, "soft,"
celebrating diversity sorts of things.
As an example, I'm listing 5 of the books that have been most inspirational
to my work below.
Thanks for your input,
Paul
1. Borderlands: La Frontera by Gloria Anzaldua
2. Multicultural Education as Social Activism by Christine Sleeter
3. John Brown by W.E.B. DuBois
4. The Critical Pedagogy Reader by Antonia Darder (Ed.)
5. Global Critical Race Feminism: An International Reader by Adrien
Katharine Wing (Ed.)
********
Paul C. Gorski
EdChange: http://www.EdChange.org
Multicultural Pavilion: http://www.EdChange.org/multicultural
Social Justice Store: http://www.cafepress.com/edchange
Multicultural Poster Store: http://www.EdChange.org/posters
SoJust Civil Rights History: http://www.SoJust.net
_______________________________________________
This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural Education -
(NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this listserv go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You can read all past postings in the archives at http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
Name-mce mailing list
Name-mce at nameorg.org
http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
Ana Mari Woehr, MA
roigassociates at yahoo.com
---------------------------------
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:06:39 -0500
From: "Talitha Abramsen" <TAbramsen at commcorp.org>
Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ 10 Most Important Books: Poll
To: <mcp at edchange.org>, "NAME-MCE - National Association for
Multicultural EducationEmailDiscussion Group" <name-mce at nameorg.org>
Message-ID: <456B1901.E218.00F2.0 at commcorp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I would like to add these ten books:
Affirming Diversity/Dr. Sonia Nieto
Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice/ Maurianne Adams, et al.
Rethinking Our Classroom/ Rethinking Schools
Countering the Urban Influence/Edward DeJesus
Cultural Proficiency: A Manual for School Leaders/Randall Lindsey, Kikanza Nuri Robins, Raymond Terrell
Reading, Writing and Rising Up/Linda Christensen
Rethinking Mathematics/Eric Gutstein
We Can't Teach What We Don't Know/Gary Howard
Pedagogy of Hope, Paulo Friere
Teaching for Community, bell hooks
***********************************************
"Fear is a natural reaction to moving closer to the truth.* Pema Chodron, When Things Fall Apart
***********************************************
Talitha Abramsen
Program Manager
Center for Youth Development and Education
Commonwealth Corporation
Tel: (413) 582-9054 x101 Fax: (413) 582-9068
Email: Tabramsen at commcorp.org
"A Common Mission. A Wealth of Possibilities"
>>> "Laliberte, Matthew Dana" <mdl at WPI.EDU> 11/27/2006 8:24 AM >>>
I look forward to seeing the comprehensive list!
In no particular order...
1. The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America's Public
Schools - David Berliner & Bruce Biddle
2. The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African-American Children -
Gloria Ladson-Billings
3. Pedagogy of the Oppressed - Paulo Freire
4. High Stakes Education: Inequality, Globalization, and Urban School Reform
- Pauline Lipman
5. Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools - Jonathan Kozol
6. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom - bell hooks
7. Walking the Road: Race, Diversity, and Social Justice in Teacher Education
- Marilyn Cochran-Smith
8. Becoming a Critical Educator: Defining a Classroom Identity, Designing a
Critical Pedagogy - Patricia Hinchey
9. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change - Ira Shor
10. Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other
Conversations about Race - Beverly Daniel Tatum
And I'd like to plug Deborah Stone's "Policy Paradox: The Art of Political
Decision Marking," which has enabled me time and again to frame many of the
issues addressed in my list.
Matt Laliberte
Boston College
Ph.D. Student
-----Original Message-----
From: name-mce-bounces at nameorg.org [mailto:name-mce-bounces at nameorg.org] On
Behalf Of Paul C.Gorski
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:12 PM
To: mcp at edchange.org
Cc: name-mce at nameorg.org
Subject: (Name-mce) ListServ 10 Most Important Books: Poll
Hello, friends.
I'm doing a bit of a poll. It's very simple. Please send me what you believe
to be the 10 (or up to 10) most important books related to equity, social
justice, and/or multicultural education. Please send the book title and
author name.
Feel free to think outside the box. The books don't have to be about
education explicitly and they don't even have to be non-fiction. But I'm
hoping for books that push boundaries, that aren't, in essence, "soft,"
celebrating diversity sorts of things.
As an example, I'm listing 5 of the books that have been most inspirational
to my work below.
Thanks for your input,
Paul
1. Borderlands: La Frontera by Gloria Anzaldua
2. Multicultural Education as Social Activism by Christine Sleeter
3. John Brown by W.E.B. DuBois
4. The Critical Pedagogy Reader by Antonia Darder (Ed.)
5. Global Critical Race Feminism: An International Reader by Adrien
Katharine Wing (Ed.)
********
Paul C. Gorski
EdChange: http://www.EdChange.org <http://www.edchange.org/>
Multicultural Pavilion: http://www.EdChange.org/multicultural
Social Justice Store: http://www.cafepress.com/edchange
Multicultural Poster Store: http://www.EdChange.org/posters
SoJust Civil Rights History: http://www.SoJust.net <http://www.sojust.net/>
_______________________________________________
This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural Education -
(NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily
reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural Education.
If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this listserv go to
http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You can read
all past postings in the archives at
http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
Name-mce mailing list
Name-mce at nameorg.org
http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:57:41 -0700
From: "Paul or Lisa" <plw2351 at zianet.com>
Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ We are all NOT racist, unconsciously
To: "NAME-MCE - National Association for Multicultural Education
EmailDiscussion Group" <name-mce at nameorg.org>
Message-ID: <000501c712a9$bc42dce0$fa581fd8 at yourdaa2649010>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
As I stated earlier, there are varying degrees of racism. In no way am I
equating my 91-year-old grandmother's racism, stemming from a White
middle-class Christian background, to your grandmother's internalized
racism. My grandmother has led a privileged life, albeit a shallow one.
Perhaps we can both agree that our grandmothers lost out because they did
not know each other.
In solidarity,
Lisa M. Weinbaum
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rita Kohli" <rkohli at ucla.edu>
To: <name-mce at nameorg.org>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:37 AM
Subject: (Name-mce) ListServ We are all NOT racist, unconsciously
>I think it is a great idea to have a workshop on addressing structural
> racism at the next conference.
>
> I also think its great that Richard's is pushing folks to reflect on
> themselves, but honestly, I do not feel that I learned (or can learn)
> about myself from his actions. What was affirmed for me is that white
> supremacy is lurking (a word someone used) and supressed in many people.
>
> As a Person of Color, and as a very reflective Person of Color on
> racism, and internalized racism, I am very aware of racism all the
> time. I also believe that for those who are not as focused on racism,
> it still should not take a white man yelling epithets on tv for "us" to
> remember racism. I see, feel and hear racism everyday- whether subtle
> or overt, whether conscious or unconscious, whether structurally
> embedded or within an individual. Racism is part of our world, our
> history. And to be the target of racism, whether structural or
> individual, can have a deep and lasting affect on People of Color, on
> our identity and the way we see our place in the world.
>
> I think as one reflects, or writes an LA times article, or speaks on
> racism, it is important not confuse words like "us" and "we" for the
> experiences of whites and People of Color. I don't mean to be
> disrespectful, but I do not waiver in my thought that the racism that
> may unfortunately lurk in your 91 year old grandmother, to me, is very
> different than the INTERNALIZED racism that my grandmother feels for
> her own community when compared to Europeans who colonized our country.
>
> I appreciate that Richard's has prompted reflection on white privelege
> and white supremacy. But I stand firm that, no matter how much he
> regrets, apologizes or is coming to terms with his racism (which I
> still doubt), he is NO hero!
>
> Whether white or a Person of Color, to quote a friend and scholar Dr.
> Picower, "we must always keep an unblinking eye on white supremacy."
> As we begin to plan the next conference, I am willing to
> participate/help in the development of race/racism conscious sessions.
> I am still a young and developing scholar, and a recent member of the
> org, so if any veteran NAME member wants to recruit or guide me in how
> to help plan, I am very open.
>
> Thanks, Rita
>
>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: We're all racists, unconsciously (Paul or Lisa)
>> 2. ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously (Ssbernabei at aol.com)
>> 3. Re: We're all racists, unconsciously (rfriedman at brookes.ac.uk)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:45:38 -0700
>> From: "Paul or Lisa" <plw2351 at zianet.com>
>> Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously
>> To: "NAME-MCE - National Association for Multicultural Education
>> EmailDiscussion Group" <name-mce at nameorg.org>
>> Message-ID: <002501c71171$ec0dc310$1f581fd8 at yourdaa2649010>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>> reply-type=original
>>
>> I absolutely agree, Rita, that Richards should not be forgiven because it
>> appeared he gave a heartfelt apology on television (he is, after all, an
>> actor). His comments are inexcusable. However, I think it is important
>> that
>> we self-reflect and examine our own biases. There are, after all,
>> varying
>> degrees of prejudice. My 91-year-old grandmother living in rural
>> small-town
>> Ohio, who has never worked outside the home, for example, is afraid of
>> African Americans. Her fear stems from her limited life experiences but
>> it
>> is racist nonetheless. Yet, she would never use the n-word publicly or
>> privately. Clearly, her racism is not as severe as Mr. Richards, yet it
>> is
>> still there lurking.
>>
>> I think the point is to take a good hard look in the mirror and
>> acknowledge
>> our own prejudices. Then work to eliminate them.
>>
>> Lisa Weinbaum
>> Las Cruces Public Schools
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rita Kohli" <rkohli at ucla.edu>
>> To: <KispokoT at aol.com>; <name-mce at nameorg.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:19 AM
>> Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously
>>
>>
>>> I am not sure if whoever posted this article had an opinion about what
>>> it is saying, but I really have a problem with it that I don't feel can
>>> go unaddressed.
>>>
>>> I do not agree that we are all racists unconsciously, I also feel
>>> strongly that I should not just accept Richards apology because he had
>>> some kind of "courage" that we do not have to share our innermost
>>> feelings of hatred.
>>>
>>> What Richards said and did was an exhibition of white power. He didn't
>>> like what was being done to him by an African American heckler, and he
>>> had the words and power to subjugate him, in a way that could never be
>>> done to a white man.
>>>
>>> The test mentioned in the article, that proves that we are all
>>> "racist," may show that whites as well as People of Color associate
>>> white with good and Black with bad on an unconscious level, but we must
>>> acknowledge the historical reasons for why People of Color may
>>> demonstrate this. Colonization, slavery, post-colonial dominance,
>>> education, media are all ways in which People of Color, globally, have
>>> been and continue to be taught to believe in a racial heirarchy where
>>> whites are deemed superior. We have been forced to believe that we are
>>> inferior, and often carry a deep self-hate, whether consciously or not.
>>> From Carter G. Woodson, to Fanon or Malcolm X, Black activists have
>>> been naming racism to allow African people to heal from a self-hate
>>> that was taught to them by their white oppressor.
>>>
>>> I, as a South Asian woman, refuse to believe that the colonization and
>>> enslavement of my people had little impact on the way that we view
>>> whiteness, light skin, Europe. And I also refuse to believe that the
>>> elements of internalized racism that I, or my community hold about
>>> ourselves or others, is the same as the deep-rooted hatred for African
>>> Americans that Richards has "unconsciously" in his heart.
>>>
>>> The interpretation of this test in this article seems to excuse racism
>>> because we all allegedly have it. There is no excuse for what was
>>> done, and in my opinion no way to forgive or not judge a man by what he
>>> said when he was drunk or angry. I have been angry or upset many times
>>> in my life, and I know for a fact that nothing like that has ever come
>>> out of my mouth.
>>>
>>> There is nothing that Richards could EVER say to get me to believe he
>>> is a decent human being. We cannot confuse white supremacy with the
>>> internalization of racism imposed on non-white people in this world, we
>>> must not confuse hate with self-hate, and I feel it is fundamental that
>>> we begin to recognize these differences.
>>>
>>> Rita Kohli
>>> Race and Ethnic Studies in Education, UCLA
>>>
>>> _http://www.latimes.http://wwhttp://www.latimhttp://wwhttp://www.latihttp://_
>>> (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-shermer24nov24,0,48454)
>>> 06.story?coll=06.story?coll=<W06
>>>
>>> We're all racists, unconsciously
>>> Kramer just blurted out what unfortunately comes naturally to all of
>>> us.
>>>
>>> By Michael Shermer
>>>
>>> MICHAEL SHERMER is the publisher of Skeptic magazine and a monthly
>>> columnist for Scientific American. His latest book is "Why Darwin
>>> Matters."
>>>
>>> November 24, 2006
>>>
>>> AFTER A PAROXYSM of racial viciousness at the Laugh Factory last week,
>>> Michael Richards, the 57-year-old comedian who played Kramer on
>>> "Seinfeld,"
>>> explained to David Letterman and his "Late Night" audience Monday: "I'm
>>> not
>>> a racist. That's what's so insane about this."
>>>
>>> Richards' shattered demeanor and heartfelt repentance leaves us with
>>> what
>>> I
>>> shall call Kramer's Conundrum: How can someone who spews racial
>>> epithets
>>> genuinely believe he is not a racist? The answer is to be found in the
>>> difference between our conscious and unconscious attitudes and our
>>> public
>>> and private thoughts.
>>>
>>> Consciously and publicly, Richards is probably not a racist. But
>>> unconsciously and privately, he is. So am I. So are you.
>>>
>>> Consciously and publicly, most of us are colorblind. And most of us,
>>> most
>>> of the time, believe and act on that cultural requisite. You'd have to
>>> be
>>> insane to publicly utter racist remarks in today's society ? or
>>> temporarily
>>> insane, which both science and the law recognize as sometimes being
>>> triggered by anger.
>>>
>>> And alcohol ? recall Mel Gibson's drunken eruption about Jews, or the
>>> college frat boys slurring alcohol-induced insanities about blacks and
>>> slavery in Sacha Baron Cohen's film "Borat."
>>>
>>> The insidiousness of racism is because of the fact that it arises out
>>> of
>>> the deep recesses of our unconscious. We may be unaware of it, yet it
>>> lurks
>>> there.
>>>
>>> How do we know this? One indication is the Implicit Association Test,
>>> developed by Harvard scientists, which asks subjects to pair words and
>>> concepts. The more closely associated the words and concepts are, the
>>> quicker the response to them will be in the key-pressing sorting task
>>> (try
>>> it yourself at _https://implicit.https://implhttps://i_
>>> (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) ).
>>>
>>> The race test firsts asks you to sort black and white faces into one of
>>> two
>>> categories: European American or African American. Easy. Next you are
>>> asked
>>> to sort a list of words (joy, terrible, love, agony, peace, horrible,
>>> wonderful, nasty, pleasure) into one of two categories: Good or Bad. No
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> The next task is a little more complicated. The words and black and
>>> white
>>> faces appear on the screen one at a time, and you sort them into one of
>>> these categories: African American/Good or European American/Bad. Again
>>> you
>>> match the words with the concepts of good or bad, and faces with
>>> national
>>> origin. So the word "joy" would go into the first category and a white
>>> face
>>> would go into the second category. This sorting goes noticeably slower,
>>> but
>>> you might expect that because the combined categories are more
>>> cognitively
>>> complex.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the final sorting task puts the lie to that
>>> rationalization.
>>> This time you sort the words and faces into the categories European
>>> American/Good or African American/Bad. Tellingly (and
>>> distressingly)Americ
>>> sorting process goes much faster than the previous one. I was much
>>> quicker
>>> to associate words like "joy," "love" and "pleasure" with European
>>> American/Good than I did with African American/Good.
>>>
>>> I consider myself about as socially liberal as you can get, and yet on
>>> a
>>> scale that includes "slight," "moderate" and "strong," the program
>>> concluded: "Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for
>>> European
>>> American compared to African American." What? "The interpretation is
>>> described as 'automatic preference for European American' if you
>>> responded
>>> faster when European American faces and Good words were classified with
>>> the
>>> same key than when African American faces and Good words were
>>> classified
>>> with the same key."
>>>
>>> But I'm not a racist. How can this be? It turns out that this
>>> subconscious
>>> association of good with European Americans is true for everyone, even
>>> African Americans, no matter how colorblind we all claim to be.
>>>
>>> We are by nature sorters. Evolutionists theorize that we evolved in
>>> small
>>> bands of hunter-gatherers when there was a selection for within-group
>>> amity
>>> and between-group enmity. With our fellow in-group members, we are
>>> cooperative and altruistic. Unfortunately, the downside to this
>>> pro-social
>>> bonding is that we are also quite tribal and xenophobic to out-group
>>> members.
>>>
>>> This natural tendency to sort people into Within-Group/This nat
>>> Between-Group/Between-Group/<WBR>Bad is shaped by culture, so that all
>>> A
>>> even those whose ancestry is African) implicitly inculcate the cultural
>>> association, which includes additional prejudices.
>>>
>>> The Harvard test, in fact, also demonstrates that we prefer young to
>>> old,
>>> thin to fat, straight to gay and such associations as family-females
>>> and
>>> career-males, liberal arts-females and science-males. Such associations
>>> bubble just below the surface, inhibited by cultural restraints but
>>> susceptible to eruption under extreme inebriation or duress.
>>>
>>> Richards' sin was his deed; his thoughts are the sin of all humanity.
>>> Only
>>> when all people are considered to be members of one global in-group (in
>>> principle if not in practice) can we begin to attenuate these out-group
>>> associations. But it won't be easy. Vigilance is the watchword of both
>>> freedom and dignity.
>>>
>>> We should accept Richards' apology for losing his temper and acting out
>>> those hateful thoughts. Perhaps we also ought to thank him for having
>>> the
>>> courage to confess in public what far too many of us still harbor in
>>> private, often in our unconscious minds. As the Russian novelist Fyodor
>>> Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which he would not tell
>>> to
>>> everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in his mind which
>>> he
>>> would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in
>>> secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell even
>>> to
>>> himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away
>>> in
>>> his mind."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
>>> Education -
>>> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
>>> diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not
>>> necessarily
>>> reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural
>>> Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this
>>> listserv
>>> go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You
>>> can read all past postings in the archives at
>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Name-mce mailing list
>>> Name-mce at nameorg.org
>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:09:17 EST
>> From: Ssbernabei at aol.com
>> Subject: (Name-mce) ListServ ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously
>> To: name-mce at nameorg.org
>> Message-ID: <be2.677698b.329b162d at aol.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>>
>> It is amazing that a race constructed country can still maintain
>> confusion and thereby white supremacy after hundreds of years and
>> hundreds and
>> hundreds of textbooks written by hundreds of experts on the subject.
>> It is sad
>> that the debate continues the confusion and pain we share around the
>> issue of
>> race and racism.
>>
>> Until we share a common definition...a common understanding of our
>> collective history grounded in facts and not left to individual
>> opinion, we will
>> continue to hurt and confuse. Historian John Hope Franklin was named
>> winner of
>> 2006 John W. Kluge Prize for the Study of Humanity the equivalent of
>> the Nobel
>> prize in History. This great announcement received little attention in
>> the
>> news.
>>
>> He is 91 years old and ends his career as a United States Historian
>> saddened by the reality that Americans still do not understand their
>> history and
>> are still not taught the truth. He refuses to be referred to as a Black
>> historian insisting that he wrote and taught American history not
>> Black history.
>>
>>
>> Racism is structural yet we continue to focus on the individual. Our
>> discussions will do nothing to change the structural arrangements
>> that keep us
>> divided and at the same time maintain the status quo that is killing
>> people of
>> color everyday as we debate the acts of individuals. "Racism cannot
>> be taught
>> away.. nor talked away. Undoing is a verb and requires organized
>> action."
>> (www.pisab.org)
>>
>> I recommend that all Name members take advantage of the Undoing
>> Racism
>> Workshop offered by The People's Institute for Survival and Beyond (led
>> by
>> people of color) and join the movement to undo structural racism.
>> The People's
>> Institute have been offering workshops on Undoing Racism for over 25
>> years and
>> maintain a focus on racism, not diversity, tolerance or
>> multiculturalism...of
>> course the workshop includes history and culture and it all makes more
>> sense
>> once we have clarity on racism.
>>
>> Perhaps The People's Institute could present at the next annual
>> conference. It may be time to consider the contribution NAME
>> members could make to
>> the movement to undo structural racism if we work together with a common
>> framework and common strategy.
>>
>> peace,
>>
>> Sandy Bernabei
>> www.antiracistalliance.com
>> a movement to undo structural racism
>> -------------
>>
>> November 24,? 2006
>>
>> AFTER A PAROXYSM of racial viciousness at the Laugh Factory last? week,
>> Michael Richards, the 57-year-old comedian who played Kramer on?
>> "Seinfeld,"
>> explained to David Letterman and his "Late Night" audience? Monday: "I'm
>> not
>> a racist. That's what's so insane about? this."
>>
>> Richards' shattered demeanor and heartfelt repentance leaves us? with
>> what I
>> shall call Kramer's Conundrum: How can someone who spews racial? epithets
>> genuinely believe he is not a racist? The answer is to be found in? the
>> difference between our conscious and unconscious attitudes and our?
>> public
>> and private thoughts.
>>
>> Consciously and publicly, Richards is? probably not a racist. But
>> unconsciously and privately, he is. So am I. So? are you.
>>
>> Consciously and publicly, most of us are colorblind. And most of? us,
>> most
>> of the time, believe and act on that cultural requisite. You'd have? to
>> be
>> insane to publicly utter racist remarks in today's society ? or?
>> temporarily
>> insane, which both science and the law recognize as sometimes? being
>> triggered by anger.
>>
>> And alcohol ? recall Mel Gibson's drunken? eruption about Jews, or the
>> college frat boys slurring alcohol-induced? insanities about blacks and
>> slavery in Sacha Baron Cohen's film? "Borat."
>>
>> The insidiousness of racism is because of the fact that it? arises out of
>> the deep recesses of our unconscious. We may be unaware of it,? yet it
>> lurks
>> there.
>>
>> How do we know this? One indication is the? Implicit Association Test,
>> developed by Harvard scientists, which asks? subjects to pair words and
>> concepts. The more closely associated the words? and concepts are, the
>> quicker the response to them will be in the? key-pressing sorting task
>> (try
>> it yourself at _https://implicit.https://implhttps://i_
>> (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/)?? ).
>>
>> The race test firsts asks you to sort black and white faces into one? of
>> two
>> categories: European American or African American. Easy. Next you are?
>> asked
>> to sort a list of words (joy, terrible, love, agony, peace,? horrible,
>> wonderful, nasty, pleasure) into one of two categories: Good or? Bad. No
>> problem.
>>
>> The next task is a little more complicated. The words? and black and
>> white
>> faces appear on the screen one at a time, and you sort? them into one of
>> these categories: African American/Good or European? American/Bad. Again
>> you
>> match the words with the concepts of good or bad, and? faces with
>> national
>> origin. So the word "joy" would go into the first? category and a white
>> face
>> would go into the second category. This sorting? goes noticeably slower,
>> but
>> you might expect that because the combined? categories are more
>> cognitively
>> complex.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the final? sorting task puts the lie to that
>> rationalization.
>> This time you sort the? words and faces into the categories European
>> American/Good or African? American/Bad. Tellingly (and
>> distressingly)Americ
>> sorting process goes? much faster than the previous one. I was much
>> quicker
>> to associate words like? "joy," "love" and "pleasure" with European
>> American/Good than I did with? African American/Good.
>>
>> I consider myself about as socially liberal as you? can get, and yet on a
>> scale that includes "slight," "moderate" and "strong,"? the program
>> concluded: "Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for? European
>> American compared to African American." What? "The interpretation? is
>> described as 'automatic preference for European American' if you?
>> responded
>> faster when European American faces and Good words were classified? with
>> the
>> same key than when African American faces and Good words were? classified
>> with the same key."
>>
>> But I'm not a racist. How can this be?? It turns out that this
>> subconscious
>> association of good with European? Americans is true for everyone, even
>> African Americans, no matter how? colorblind we all claim to be.
>>
>> We are by nature sorters. Evolutionists? theorize that we evolved in
>> small
>> bands of hunter-gatherers when there was a? selection for within-group
>> amity
>> and between-group enmity. With our fellow? in-group members, we are
>> cooperative and altruistic. Unfortunately, the? downside to this
>> pro-social
>> bonding is that we are also quite tribal and? xenophobic to out-group
>> members.
>>
>> This natural tendency to sort people? into Within-Group/This nat
>> Between-Group/Between-Group/<WBR>Bad is shaped by culture,? so that all A
>> even those whose ancestry is African)? implicitly inculcate the cultural
>> association, which includes additional? prejudices.
>>
>> The Harvard test, in fact, also demonstrates that we prefer? young to
>> old,
>> thin to fat, straight to gay and such associations as? family-females and
>> career-males, liberal arts-females and science-males. Such? associations
>> bubble just below the surface, inhibited by cultural restraints? but
>> susceptible to eruption under extreme inebriation or? duress.
>>
>> Richards' sin was his deed; his thoughts are the sin of all? humanity.
>> Only
>> when all people are considered to be members of one global? in-group (in
>> principle if not in practice) can we begin to attenuate these? out-group
>> associations. But it won't be easy. Vigilance is the watchword of? both
>> freedom and dignity.
>>
>> We should accept Richards' apology for? losing his temper and acting out
>> those hateful thoughts. Perhaps we also? ought to thank him for having
>> the
>> courage to confess in public what far too? many of us still harbor in
>> private, often in our unconscious minds. As the? Russian novelist Fyodor
>> Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which? he would not tell
>> to
>> everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in? his mind which he
>> would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself,? and that in
>> secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell? even to
>> himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away? in
>> his mind."
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
>> Education -
>> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
>> diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not
>> necessarily reflect a
>> position of the National Association for Multicultural Education. If
>> you would
>> like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this listserv go to
>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You
>> can read all past postings in
>> the archives at http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> Name-mce mailing list
>> Name-mce at nameorg.org
>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:43:11 -0000 (GMT)
>> From: rfriedman at brookes.ac.uk
>> Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously
>> To: "NAME-MCE - National Association for Multicultural Education Email
>> Discussion Group" <name-mce at nameorg.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <2954.86.145.1.172.1164584591.squirrel at webmail.brookes.ac.uk>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>>
>> hello i have been following the news on this story-i am not sure if we
>> are
>> in position to forgive Richards-is that our job? and is that the angle
>> that we need to adopt...i am not convinced--however i think that as was
>> suggested on one newssite-that we need to turn this incident around and
>> learn from it for ourselves and our communities...the men in the audience
>> could have insulted Richards in a way that many white men cannot
>> understand and they could have called him one of the names that are used
>> for Jews-there are plenty of things that could have happened...but didn't
>> the 'n' word is a word that makes me 'uncomfortable'[and this is not a
>> significantly strong enough word] whether i am hearing men women or
>> children that are black, white or any other colour saying it, however to
>> pretend that i do not know that word or that it exists would be a
>> lie...that word is heard in popular songs of today, i have heard people
>> that are black and people that are white using that word...i do not use
>> that word...but i know that it exists...
>> a favorite quote of mine is 'justice, justice you should pursue' and an
>> interpretation of this quote that makes it appeal to me is the one that
>> attempts to explain why justice is written twice...why? because it is a
>> reminder that we should pursue justice with justice...and from where i
>> sit
>> it seems that Richards is attempting to do this in the face of his own
>> behavior...and i would like to suggest that instead of staring and finger
>> pointing, we take this opportunity to look more closely inside of
>> ourselves and confront our own beliefs---we never know what tomorrow will
>> bring--Richards is working to understanding himself and to mend the
>> damage...i would like to think that if i were to cause pain and
>> humiliation to others that i would be strong enough to face my
>> self...let's pull together instead of apart..we can be stronger that
>> way--Rachel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I absolutely agree, Rita, that Richards should not be forgiven because
>>> it
>>> appeared he gave a heartfelt apology on television (he is, after all, an
>>> actor). His comments are inexcusable. However, I think it is important
>>> that
>>> we self-reflect and examine our own biases. There are, after all,
>>> varying
>>> degrees of prejudice. My 91-year-old grandmother living in rural
>>> small-town
>>> Ohio, who has never worked outside the home, for example, is afraid of
>>> African Americans. Her fear stems from her limited life experiences but
>>> it
>>> is racist nonetheless. Yet, she would never use the n-word publicly or
>>> privately. Clearly, her racism is not as severe as Mr. Richards, yet it
>>> is
>>> still there lurking.
>>>
>>> I think the point is to take a good hard look in the mirror and
>>> acknowledge
>>> our own prejudices. Then work to eliminate them.
>>>
>>> Lisa Weinbaum
>>> Las Cruces Public Schools
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Rita Kohli" <rkohli at ucla.edu>
>>> To: <KispokoT at aol.com>; <name-mce at nameorg.org>
>>> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:19 AM
>>> Subject: Re: (Name-mce) ListServ We're all racists, unconsciously
>>>
>>>
>>>> I am not sure if whoever posted this article had an opinion about what
>>>> it is saying, but I really have a problem with it that I don't feel can
>>>> go unaddressed.
>>>>
>>>> I do not agree that we are all racists unconsciously, I also feel
>>>> strongly that I should not just accept Richards apology because he had
>>>> some kind of "courage" that we do not have to share our innermost
>>>> feelings of hatred.
>>>>
>>>> What Richards said and did was an exhibition of white power. He didn't
>>>> like what was being done to him by an African American heckler, and he
>>>> had the words and power to subjugate him, in a way that could never be
>>>> done to a white man.
>>>>
>>>> The test mentioned in the article, that proves that we are all
>>>> "racist," may show that whites as well as People of Color associate
>>>> white with good and Black with bad on an unconscious level, but we must
>>>> acknowledge the historical reasons for why People of Color may
>>>> demonstrate this. Colonization, slavery, post-colonial dominance,
>>>> education, media are all ways in which People of Color, globally, have
>>>> been and continue to be taught to believe in a racial heirarchy where
>>>> whites are deemed superior. We have been forced to believe that we are
>>>> inferior, and often carry a deep self-hate, whether consciously or not.
>>>> From Carter G. Woodson, to Fanon or Malcolm X, Black activists have
>>>> been naming racism to allow African people to heal from a self-hate
>>>> that was taught to them by their white oppressor.
>>>>
>>>> I, as a South Asian woman, refuse to believe that the colonization and
>>>> enslavement of my people had little impact on the way that we view
>>>> whiteness, light skin, Europe. And I also refuse to believe that the
>>>> elements of internalized racism that I, or my community hold about
>>>> ourselves or others, is the same as the deep-rooted hatred for African
>>>> Americans that Richards has "unconsciously" in his heart.
>>>>
>>>> The interpretation of this test in this article seems to excuse racism
>>>> because we all allegedly have it. There is no excuse for what was
>>>> done, and in my opinion no way to forgive or not judge a man by what he
>>>> said when he was drunk or angry. I have been angry or upset many times
>>>> in my life, and I know for a fact that nothing like that has ever come
>>>> out of my mouth.
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing that Richards could EVER say to get me to believe he
>>>> is a decent human being. We cannot confuse white supremacy with the
>>>> internalization of racism imposed on non-white people in this world, we
>>>> must not confuse hate with self-hate, and I feel it is fundamental that
>>>> we begin to recognize these differences.
>>>>
>>>> Rita Kohli
>>>> Race and Ethnic Studies in Education, UCLA
>>>>
>>>> _http://www.latimes.http://wwhttp://www.latimhttp://wwhttp://www.latihttp://_
>>>> (http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-shermer24nov24,0,48454)
>>>> 06.story?coll=06.story?coll=<W06
>>>>
>>>> We're all racists, unconsciously
>>>> Kramer just blurted out what unfortunately comes naturally to all of
>>>> us.
>>>>
>>>> By Michael Shermer
>>>>
>>>> MICHAEL SHERMER is the publisher of Skeptic magazine and a monthly
>>>> columnist for Scientific American. His latest book is "Why Darwin
>>>> Matters."
>>>>
>>>> November 24, 2006
>>>>
>>>> AFTER A PAROXYSM of racial viciousness at the Laugh Factory last week,
>>>> Michael Richards, the 57-year-old comedian who played Kramer on
>>>> "Seinfeld,"
>>>> explained to David Letterman and his "Late Night" audience Monday:
>>>> "I'm
>>>> not
>>>> a racist. That's what's so insane about this."
>>>>
>>>> Richards' shattered demeanor and heartfelt repentance leaves us with
>>>> what
>>>> I
>>>> shall call Kramer's Conundrum: How can someone who spews racial
>>>> epithets
>>>> genuinely believe he is not a racist? The answer is to be found in the
>>>> difference between our conscious and unconscious attitudes and our
>>>> public
>>>> and private thoughts.
>>>>
>>>> Consciously and publicly, Richards is probably not a racist. But
>>>> unconsciously and privately, he is. So am I. So are you.
>>>>
>>>> Consciously and publicly, most of us are colorblind. And most of us,
>>>> most
>>>> of the time, believe and act on that cultural requisite. You'd have to
>>>> be
>>>> insane to publicly utter racist remarks in today's society ? or
>>>> temporarily
>>>> insane, which both science and the law recognize as sometimes being
>>>> triggered by anger.
>>>>
>>>> And alcohol ? recall Mel Gibson's drunken eruption about Jews, or the
>>>> college frat boys slurring alcohol-induced insanities about blacks and
>>>> slavery in Sacha Baron Cohen's film "Borat."
>>>>
>>>> The insidiousness of racism is because of the fact that it arises out
>>>> of
>>>> the deep recesses of our unconscious. We may be unaware of it, yet it
>>>> lurks
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> How do we know this? One indication is the Implicit Association Test,
>>>> developed by Harvard scientists, which asks subjects to pair words and
>>>> concepts. The more closely associated the words and concepts are, the
>>>> quicker the response to them will be in the key-pressing sorting task
>>>> (try
>>>> it yourself at _https://implicit.https://implhttps://i_
>>>> (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) ).
>>>>
>>>> The race test firsts asks you to sort black and white faces into one
>>>> of
>>>> two
>>>> categories: European American or African American. Easy. Next you are
>>>> asked
>>>> to sort a list of words (joy, terrible, love, agony, peace, horrible,
>>>> wonderful, nasty, pleasure) into one of two categories: Good or Bad.
>>>> No
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> The next task is a little more complicated. The words and black and
>>>> white
>>>> faces appear on the screen one at a time, and you sort them into one
>>>> of
>>>> these categories: African American/Good or European American/Bad.
>>>> Again
>>>> you
>>>> match the words with the concepts of good or bad, and faces with
>>>> national
>>>> origin. So the word "joy" would go into the first category and a white
>>>> face
>>>> would go into the second category. This sorting goes noticeably
>>>> slower,
>>>> but
>>>> you might expect that because the combined categories are more
>>>> cognitively
>>>> complex.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the final sorting task puts the lie to that
>>>> rationalization.
>>>> This time you sort the words and faces into the categories European
>>>> American/Good or African American/Bad. Tellingly (and
>>>> distressingly)Americ
>>>> sorting process goes much faster than the previous one. I was much
>>>> quicker
>>>> to associate words like "joy," "love" and "pleasure" with European
>>>> American/Good than I did with African American/Good.
>>>>
>>>> I consider myself about as socially liberal as you can get, and yet on
>>>> a
>>>> scale that includes "slight," "moderate" and "strong," the program
>>>> concluded: "Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for
>>>> European
>>>> American compared to African American." What? "The interpretation is
>>>> described as 'automatic preference for European American' if you
>>>> responded
>>>> faster when European American faces and Good words were classified
>>>> with
>>>> the
>>>> same key than when African American faces and Good words were
>>>> classified
>>>> with the same key."
>>>>
>>>> But I'm not a racist. How can this be? It turns out that this
>>>> subconscious
>>>> association of good with European Americans is true for everyone, even
>>>> African Americans, no matter how colorblind we all claim to be.
>>>>
>>>> We are by nature sorters. Evolutionists theorize that we evolved in
>>>> small
>>>> bands of hunter-gatherers when there was a selection for within-group
>>>> amity
>>>> and between-group enmity. With our fellow in-group members, we are
>>>> cooperative and altruistic. Unfortunately, the downside to this
>>>> pro-social
>>>> bonding is that we are also quite tribal and xenophobic to out-group
>>>> members.
>>>>
>>>> This natural tendency to sort people into Within-Group/This nat
>>>> Between-Group/Between-Group/<WBR>Bad is shaped by culture, so that all
>>>> A
>>>> even those whose ancestry is African) implicitly inculcate the
>>>> cultural
>>>> association, which includes additional prejudices.
>>>>
>>>> The Harvard test, in fact, also demonstrates that we prefer young to
>>>> old,
>>>> thin to fat, straight to gay and such associations as family-females
>>>> and
>>>> career-males, liberal arts-females and science-males. Such
>>>> associations
>>>> bubble just below the surface, inhibited by cultural restraints but
>>>> susceptible to eruption under extreme inebriation or duress.
>>>>
>>>> Richards' sin was his deed; his thoughts are the sin of all humanity.
>>>> Only
>>>> when all people are considered to be members of one global in-group
>>>> (in
>>>> principle if not in practice) can we begin to attenuate these
>>>> out-group
>>>> associations. But it won't be easy. Vigilance is the watchword of both
>>>> freedom and dignity.
>>>>
>>>> We should accept Richards' apology for losing his temper and acting
>>>> out
>>>> those hateful thoughts. Perhaps we also ought to thank him for having
>>>> the
>>>> courage to confess in public what far too many of us still harbor in
>>>> private, often in our unconscious minds. As the Russian novelist
>>>> Fyodor
>>>> Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which he would not
>>>> tell
>>>> to
>>>> everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in his mind which
>>>> he
>>>> would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in
>>>> secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell even
>>>> to
>>>> himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away
>>>> in
>>>> his mind."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
>>>> Education -
>>>> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
>>>> diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not
>>>> necessarily
>>>> reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural
>>>> Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this
>>>> listserv
>>>> go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org.
>>>> You
>>>> can read all past postings in the archives at
>>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Name-mce mailing list
>>>> Name-mce at nameorg.org
>>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
>>> Education
>>> -
>>> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
>>> diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not
>>> necessarily
>>> reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural
>>> Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this
>>> listserv
>>> go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You
>>> can read all past postings in the archives at
>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Name-mce mailing list
>>> Name-mce at nameorg.org
>>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
>> Education -
>> (NAME) Listserv. The materials included reflect diverse perspectives
>> of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily reflect a
>> position of the National Association for Multicultural Education. If
>> you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe) to this listserv go to
>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You
>> can read all past postings in the archives at
>> http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>>
>>
>> Name-mce mailing list
>> Name-mce at nameorg.org
>> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>>
>>
>> End of Name-mce Digest, Vol 374, Issue 1
>> ****************************************
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural
> Education -
> (NAME) Listserv list - www.nameorg.org. The materials included reflect
> diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily
> reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural
> Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe)to this listserv
> go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You
> can read all past postings in the archives at
> http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
>
>
>
> Name-mce mailing list
> Name-mce at nameorg.org
> http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This is a mailing of the National Association for Multicultural Education -
(NAME) Listserv. The materials included reflect diverse perspectives of NAME Listserv participants and do not necessarily reflect a position of the National Association for Multicultural Education. If you would like to subscribe (or unsubscribe) to this listserv go to http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org. You can read all past postings in the archives at http://mail.nameorg.org/pipermail/name-mce_nameorg.org/
Name-mce mailing list
Name-mce at nameorg.org
http://mail.nameorg.org/mailman/listinfo/name-mce_nameorg.org
End of Name-mce Digest, Vol 375, Issue 1
****************************************
More information about the Name-mce
mailing list